Why you might want to redeem your Bitcoin from THORChain’s lending service

Follow Frank on X.

Two days ago, atebites’ X account pointed out that THORChain’s loan service currently does not have nearly enough bitcoin to repay its creditors.

At the time of posting, the total amount of bitcoin to be returned to depositors was 1,604, while the lending pool only had 592 bitcoin in it.

As Lava founder Shehzan Maredia explained in a post on X, when you borrow on THORChain, they sell the bitcoin you pledge as collateral for their own token, RUNE. When you repay your loan, they sell RUNE for bitcoin to give you back your security.

The actual mechanics of how this works are a bit more complex and are detailed on the THORChain website.

See screenshots from the website below:

The primary problem in this scenario is that half of the value borrowed in US dollars was borrowed when bitcoin was trading at significantly lower prices than what bitcoin is trading at today, according to atebites.

This means that in order for THORChain to meet its current requirements, it must mint up to 24 million RUNE (as of January 8). While this would only be about 8% of the circulating supply of RUNE, it would lead to a reduction in the price of the asset, giving THORChain even less purchasing power as they attempt to buy back bitcoin on behalf of their creditors.

If traders were to start shorting RUNE on top of this, THORChain’s ability to purchase the necessary amount of bitcoin to redeem its creditors would be further diminished.

This could lead to something similar to the Terra/Luna death spiral we saw in 2022.

That said, prominent supporter of the project Erik Voorhees shared that THORChain’s lending service is working as intended and there is no foreseeable danger:

A core developer of THORChain, who goes by the name Nine Realms on X, also made the case that THORChain is resilient:

With all that said, if you still feel bad about loaning THORChain your bitcoin as collateral for a loan, you might want to cash it in. If I used the service, I would.

This article is one Take. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Leave a Comment