A federal trial filed on behalf of dissatisfied consumers claims that Apple misleading buyers with promises of advanced artificial intelligence functions to Siri that was never realized. The complaint claims that Apple, in a high-profile marketing campaign for the iPhone 16 Series, proclaimed a package of capacities-assembled branded as Apple Intelligence-which was never delivered and deceived millions for overpayment for devices that lacked the promised functionality.
False promises and misleading marketing
According to the complaint filed by plaintiff Peter Landsheft, Apple’s aggressive advertising campaign built significant consumer expectations. The company claimed that Siri would soon offer personal help by drawing on a user’s context, which allows commands such as “Play the podcast that Jamie recommended,” or “When is Mom’s Flight Landing?” and perform hundreds of new actions across apps. However, the trial claims that these claims were nothing but marketing hype. Apple has since admitted that such advanced features are not currently found and if they ever do, they will not be available until 2026.
See: Apple Passwords App Vulnerability Exposed Users For Months Months
In the case, Apple claims that, by advertising non-existent functions, Apple violated several State Consumer Protection Laws, including California’s unreasonable competition legislation, false advertised and consumer legal remedies. In addition, the complaint accuses the technical giant of fraud, negligent wrong representation, violation of the contract and violation of the implied guarantee of marketability.
Consumer impact and industry implications
The complaint in the class claims that the misleading campaign not only induced consumers to buy the new iPhone models at Premium prices, but also unfairly increased Apple’s market position.
See: EU cracks down on Apple for competitive behavior-here is what Apple told us in response
The false promises were widely conveyed through TV, social media and the company’s own retail channels and reached millions during peak periods such as the NFL season. This widespread erroneous representation claims the trial, not only injured consumers financially, but also distorted competition in the smartphone market at a time when rivals such as Samsung, Google and others aggressively promote their own AI capacities.
While Apple has not yet commented on the trial, trade analysts notice that the company’s matches in the AI ​​race are becoming more and more clear. The trial can force Apple to revise its marketing practice and potentially offer compensation to affected consumers, which emphasizes the risks facing companies when promising pioneering innovation without the technique of backing up it.
This legal challenge acts as a sharp reminder of the importance of accurate advertising on today’s tech-powered market-one lesson for both consumers and businesses navigating in the rapidly developing AI landscape.